Inside Kick Mic Placement: Capturing Attack and Definition
Inside Kick Mic Placement: Capturing Attack and Definition
Inside kick mic placement positions the microphone within the drum shell, typically through a port hole in the resonant head. This technique prioritizes attack and definition over low-end weight, capturing the beater impact with clarity that outside placement cannot match. Most modern rock, pop, and metal productions rely on inside placement as the primary kick drum capture method.
Understanding the Sound Inside the Shell
The interior of a kick drum presents a unique acoustic environment. The batter head produces initial attack when the beater strikes, while the shell resonates and the resonant head contributes sustain and fundamental tone. Microphone position within this space determines which elements dominate the capture.
Close to the batter head, attack and high-frequency content predominate. The percussive “click” of beater on head appears prominently, while low-frequency content remains less developed. This position suits styles requiring cutting attack through dense arrangements.
Moving toward the resonant head increases low-frequency capture and reduces attack prominence. The shell resonance develops more fully at distances from the batter head. Centered positions balance attack and tone, offering a middle-ground starting point.
The port hole itself affects sound. Air movement through the port creates its own sonic signature, sometimes adding desirable “whoosh” to the capture. Microphones positioned directly in the port hole line capture this effect prominently.
Standard Inside Placement Positions
The classic inside placement positions the microphone capsule roughly halfway into the shell, aimed at the beater impact point. This balanced position captures both attack from the batter head and resonance from the shell, providing flexibility during mixing.
Distance from the batter head typically ranges from 4 to 12 inches depending on desired attack-to-tone ratio. Closer positions emphasize attack; farther positions capture more low-end development. The drum’s size affects these relationships—larger shells require greater distances to capture similar balance.
Angle matters significantly. Aiming directly at the beater impact point maximizes attack capture. Angling toward the shell instead of the head reduces attack and increases shell tone contribution. Some engineers aim toward the junction of head and shell for balanced capture.
Off-center positioning captures different beater attack characteristics. The beater impact point varies with pedal and beater configuration—positioning the microphone to intersect the actual impact zone ensures accurate attack capture.
Capsule Depth and Shell Interaction
Shallow placement keeps the capsule near the port hole, capturing significant resonant head contribution despite being technically inside the drum. This position combines inside attack characteristics with some outside tonal qualities.
Deep placement brings the capsule close to the batter head—sometimes within two to four inches. This extreme position captures dramatic attack with minimal shell resonance. The sound proves useful for styles demanding cutting presence, though it may require supplemental microphones for low-end fullness.
Shell reflections affect capture at all positions. Sound bouncing within the cylindrical shell creates complex phase relationships that color the microphone’s output. Different positions encounter different reflection patterns, partly explaining why small positioning changes create noticeable tonal shifts.
Dealing with Common Challenges
Air movement from the batter head creates significant pressure waves inside the kick drum. These pressure changes can cause unwanted low-frequency rumble or “pumping” in recordings. High-pass filtering at the microphone or preamp stage reduces this problem without affecting useful low-frequency content.
Blankets or pillows inside the shell affect microphone placement options. These dampening materials reduce internal reflections and sustain, creating a more focused sound. Microphones positioned near dampening material capture different characteristics than those in open shell space.
Beater contact noise—the physical click of beater meeting head—can prove excessive in inside placements. Distance from the impact point and angle adjustment reduce this effect. Beater selection also influences this noise; felt beaters produce softer attack than plastic or wood.
Combining Inside and Outside Microphones
Professional productions frequently use both inside and outside kick microphones, combining attack from inside placement with low-end weight from outside. This technique provides maximum flexibility during mixing, allowing engineers to balance characteristics for specific musical requirements.
When combining microphones, phase alignment becomes critical. The inside microphone captures sound before the outside microphone due to shorter distance from the source. This timing difference creates phase cancellation if not addressed. Nudging track alignment or using phase adjustment plugins resolves the issue.
Polarity checking between inside and outside microphones reveals whether they reinforce or cancel at low frequencies. Flipping polarity on one microphone often dramatically improves combined low-end response. Both polarities should be auditioned before committing to a choice.
The inside microphone typically provides attack while the outside microphone contributes fundamental weight. High-pass filtering the inside microphone and low-pass filtering the outside creates frequency separation that prevents comb filtering while allowing combined characteristics.
Promote your music to 500K+ engaged listeners. Ads start at $2.50 CPM with guaranteed clicks.
Advertise Your Music